Pour opponents of Patrick Balkany, the report of the Court of accounts sounds like a new confirmation of the opacity that they “denounce” for years. “Once again, an independent authority sheds light on the opaque management of the city,” says Anne-Eugenie Faure, councillor PS. It validates our speech, with this difference that she, at least, she has all the documents. It is time that this stops, that this must be managed by the city back in her lap. “
The opponent (DVD) Arnaud de Courson, recently invested by The Republicans for the next legislative demand that ” justice seizes this folder in order for light to be shed on the full extent of these practices and the responsibilities of the elected officials in their implementation “. And promise, if he is elected as an mp, ” a bill to impose the presence of opposition groups in the management of all the agencies satellites of territorial communities “.
For Balkany, “it is better to be accused of everything under control” than the reverse
For the Association of taxpayers of Levallois-Perret (ACLP), the report is not a surprise either. “The denunciation of the opacity has always been our tireless refrain,” the association said in a statement. “We expect explanations on irregularities at the next city council and want a discount flat total how to manage this city,” adds Sebastien Blanc, general secretary of the association. It is necessary to finish with this mode of operation. “
For his part, Patrick Balkany has responded to the publication of the report on his account Facebook. “Overall, the Court criticises the municipality to control everything in Levallois, he writes. Nice deal, when, in the same report, it accuses the State of not to control anything. So, it is better to be accused of controlling everything, and I am glad, that to be accused of subsidizing services or bodies in which all goes to vau the water ! “The conceiving prefers to highlight the” special remarks “very positive” in the report : “fiscal pressure is very moderate “, ” parking rates low “, etc