Le Monde | • Updated | By
for months now the subject holds public debate, and it is only now the Assembly will really grasp. Examined for two weeks in public session from Tuesday, May 3, Bill work is now in its parliamentary phase. Despite social protest that does not go out, the record shows clearly better than at the beginning. Myriam El Khomri says, in an interview with Paris of 3 May, it “refuses to make the threat” the use of Article 49-3 of the Constitution, for passing a text without a vote, to impose his bill
Read also. “Labour Act” provides that the reform before the examination by the national Assembly
“I’m not in this perspective” , emphasizes the Minister of Labour, which says wait and see “how things are going” Parliament. The government has come a long two and a half months after comemorative of the minister who had left to hear otherwise, February 18 Les Echos, that 49-3 could be committed.
in the Assembly, MPs, already in full whirl of the constitutional review, had immediately wheelies. And not just the usual slingers. The Socialist Party, the first secretary, Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, had had no choice but to ask for a rewrite of the bill when, a few days later, this is Martine Aubry who had hit a blow by signing an article in Le Monde , where she thundered that “enough is enough! “ At the same time, the Internet, the petition launched by activist Caroline De Haas collected over one million signatures in two weeks.
New Version less corrosive
Swamped on several fronts, the government was forced to step back and to announce on February 29, a delay of two weeks of the submission of the text by the Cabinet. For its part, M me El Khomri continued its quasi-way cross, before the Socialist Party national bureau and then to the Committee on Social Affairs where she defended a new less corrosive release.
Still, on the eve of the debate at the meeting, it is clear that the text is not rewriting overcame social movements – even if the gathering of the 1 st -May was small. However, the Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, let not appear signs of anxiety. In official visit to New Caledonia, New Zealand and Australia until Tuesday, May 3, he followed from afar the last preparations. He wants to “confident”, “completely alone” , as he told reporters who accompanied him. The head of government continues to grant “errors” on the preparation and communication, but things have changed in his past with good economic results.
If he refuses to the “social weather” , it considers that the protest movement is slowing and therefore radicalized in part. Above all, he is convinced that it will weigh somewhat on debates in the National Assembly. Rather, it is “parliamentary debate [that] may weigh on the social climate” and mitigate, he says.
5000 amendments
in the Socialist group, the member for Saône-et-Loire Christophe Sirugue seems, indeed, have for the moment calmed the situation, after a difficult start. deemed serious and hardworking, a former vice president of the Assembly first showed his teeth when he was asked to be rapporteur, arguing that it would only accept if substantial changes were made. Given the rewriting of the text, he accepted the position and played the game of the ambassador with his family, working between education and belief.
But that did not stop servers the national Assembly to “plant” during the weekend, under the huge load of about 5 000 amendments tabled to the draft of fifty articles. If the opposition to the PS appears for now to have reduced the slingers, they warn that they will lead the “parliamentary battle” . “The sticking points remain,” Laurent Baumel believes that nevertheless recognizes the changes to the text. Even in less protest elect as Jean-Patrick Gille, who filed forty amendments, some points remain problematic, such as the reversal of the hierarchy of norms under which a company agreement to prevail over branch agreement.
More generally, the PS continues, him, talk to blows stands. Sunday, several socialist, mainly aubrystes, have published a text on the website of Libération in which they feel it is “still time” find ” a new path “ to reform the labor code. Friday, April 29, in Le Monde , others elected were opposed on the question of whether “I feel better” “Yes, our country going in the right direction “, replied a group while on the same page, another (mostly slingers) estimated that ” no, without popular participation, nothing can go “.
Weakening the executive
the Communists are themselves opposed to the text, as some environmentalists but it remains difficult to an overview. In slingers, “we stopped counts” , says Laurent Baumel who judge that since the constitutional revision (119 Socialists refused to vote), the Socialist Group “entered an area of uncertainty. That could free up parliamentarians who will switch alone in their corner without anyone seen “.
” It moves a lot, it does not count for sure moment “, ahead of his side advisor Matignon when Christophe Sirugue said in an interview with Paris Monday, May 2, was missing ” nearly 40 votes to get a majority “. But no question to consider major changes. “The balance was found with the commission, if there are changes, it will be at the margin” , warns Manuel Valls. Nevertheless, it remains cautious and is concerned especially Matignon ulterior motives of some of the PS deputies who might want to take this last legislative window of opportunity to weaken the executive to a year of presidential elections. “It depends if the debate is really about the text or make some longer-term political calculations” says the entourage of the Prime Minister.
Myriam El Khomri, in turn, will deliver the opening speech on Tuesday afternoon, and reiterated on Sunday that there was no question of withdrawing the bill “just and necessary”. After his poor start, the minister has continued to show benevolent with the majority and will have to confirm his intentions in public if she really wants to put aside the 49-3, increasingly complicated stir in the climate.
Finally, the right cheek for now a game that begins to know. After advanced early saluting a text they could write, many opposition politicians do now backtracked, saying the text in its new version does not go as far. Exactly the same positioning as the Macron law early 2015. The question is whether the labor law suffer the same fate at the time of voting, scheduled May 17
Read also: Myriam El Khomri, headwind
No comments:
Post a Comment