It is in higher than usual soundscape that took place on the oral exam of the Minister of Labour, Myriam El Khomri who presented it on March 29 its much-maligned bill reforming the labor code, before the members of the social Affairs Committee of the national Assembly.
“I understand that a text so profoundly reform raises questions and requires debate, has pointed the Minister in the introduction. I will reiterate my total commitment to be listening to the national representation collectively to build a society where economic and social progress are bound up. ”
The good willingness of the minister did not fall in deaf ears deputies came very many to listen to his words.
STORIES & gt; & gt; Labour law in the Council of Ministers: what has changed, what still stuck
Reviews everywhere
“This commission has never been so busy, exclaimed Catherine Lemorton, who chaired the proceedings and has striven to limit the unpleasant hubbub that reigned in the small room with great blows of “Hush.” the President also had to make some reminders the basic courtesy to the member of Yvelines Arnaud Richard, for the IDU group, which has hardly hidden its aggressiveness against the minister. “it’s not a big text but a large text” a- he blurted bluntly, criticizing the lack of prior consultation with the social partners. A tackle unjustified since the State Council itself has not identified any fault on the part of the government.
for over an hour, the minister has faced over sixty issues, both of Presidents and MPs (members or not) of the commission came to attend this presentation. A veritable tunnel of questions and criticisms – the major key interventions are overwhelmingly negative.
Critics as hard as varied: the first came from the socialist Christophe Sirugue, rapporteur of the text. The MP said wait details including the conditions of redundancy and vowed to see the text “evolve”, saying that “workers’ rights can not be sacrificed.” The rapporteur also wished to be heard requests TPE-SMEs.
The opposition was not left since Republicans for the member Yves Censi, there is a text “to bluff on fundamental rights.” Left Front side, the member Jacqueline Fraysse found that it was about to relinquish “the law of his protective nature.”
STORIES & gt; & gt; Labour law: what timetable before the final vote
“No blank check companies”
But Myriam El Khomri listened patiently without ever really losing his smile indestructible.
Perhaps stung by this criticism, the minister was more offensive than at initial presentation. Considering the current system “out of breath”, she fought to give “a blank check companies” and said she was not in a “naive and complacent vision of social dialogue.”
The Minister then defended on behalf of staff activity (CPA), considering that the “portability of workers’ rights will be, thanks to the CPA, full”.
About the new architecture between business agreements and sectoral agreements, Myriam El Khomri argued the government’s desire to proceed in stages, with the only question of working time at first . She also reiterated the promise of Manuel Valls to conduct a status of the device footprint.
Criteria for redundancy according to company size?
On the verge of redundancy much discussed, specified in Article 30, the minister said she would not return to the definition in the text, but was “open to a differentiation criteria between TPE-SMEs and large enterprises.”
Finally, the minister also suggested that Article 6 of religious freedom in business could “evolve” over the debate, even if it only repeats jurisprudence.
The first approach between the minister and the members therefore was not a cakewalk for the tenant of the Rue de Grenelle. At 7:15 p.m. while she was struggling to respond to each question of the deputies came to hear the minister noticed that the room was nearly empty …
The marathon is not yet beginning. “We still have hours and hours of debate” promised President Catherine Lemorton. debate for hours and kilos of amendments in perspective …
No comments:
Post a Comment